Disclaimer: Some links in my review for Bi: Notes for a Bisexual Revolution by Shiri Eisner are affiliate links. If you click them to make a purchase, I will earn a commission. Whether or not you make a purchase is entirely up to you.
A version of this book review first appeared in The Lesbrary.
Summary
While Shiri Eisner published Bi: Notes for a Bisexual Revolution over 10 years ago, it still resonates. This shows how far we still have to go in the bisexual movement. But it also shows how far it’s come.
Right from the introduction, Eisner lays out her own privileges and biases. She holds herself accountable and acknowledges that her perspective is incomplete or skewed. It’s impossible to craft a perfect point of view, but it’s important to recognize when one falls short. It gives the reader a chance to fill the gaps that she may have missed or experienced differently.
Structure of Bi: Notes for a Bisexual Revolution
Before diving into anything, Eisner defines the differences between being liberal and radical. While liberal movements seek to gain power within an established system, radical (stemming from the Latin word for “root”) movements seek to cut out oppression from the root. This sets up the idea of bisexuality as a way of dismantling rather than normalizing.
Definitions of Bisexuality
Eisner delves into the constantly evolving definition of the word bisexual. It started as part of a binary, but grew into the multifaceted definition that prevails today. While early discourse established bisexuality in cisgender terms, it has since adapted to the fluid notions of sex and gender.
Many often accuse bisexuality of reaffirming the gender binary, but in fact, it has the potential to subvert these systems. Because of its fluidity and multiplicity, bisexuality serves as a lens to break down hierarchical binaries of good/bad, true/false, etc. Rather than go through a myth-busting of stereotypes, Eisner leans into what they could mean. For example, the idea of bisexuality as a phase, a common stereotype, opens the door to the idea that sexuality is not fixed and instead an open-ended and continual process.
Strengths & Weaknesses
The section that felt like it needed another perspective or a strengthened argument was her comparison of bi-erasure to the idea of “passing,” both in how it relates to race and gender expression. She makes a valid point in saying that society tells us appearance equals identity, but this chapter felt like it lacked a deeper understanding, specifically in relation to racial passing.
However, she does point out how bisexuality disrupts the social hierarchy by making it hard for those in power to perceive who is Other, thereby accidentally giving an outsider the same power and privileges as those who participate in oppression. Because it’s the visual cues that alert those in power who to oppress, and without these cues, they cannot properly implement their oppression.
Conclusion & Rating
Eisner covers a lot of ground in the book, so it’s hard to go into detail about every single topic. But the overall concept she pushes for is to use a bisexual revolution to disrupt systems, not make it palatable for the masses. Furthermore, it should work toward creating a world that benefits everyone, not fight for the same privileges as our current oppressors; a true bisexual revolution would not leave anyone behind.
Rating: 4 out of 5 stars